Negative Content Would Lead

Negative Content Would Lead

In 2012, Facebook conducted an experiment on 700,000 Facebook users without these users knowing about the research. Facebook divided these users into two groups and displayed more negative content in the news feed of one group and more positive content in the news feed of the other group. Facebook found that those users who had more negative content in their news feed were more likely to make more negative posts themselves. The opposite was found with the other group as more positive posts were made by individuals who experienced more positive content.

Considering what you have learned about ethics in research this week, what ethical issues are raised by this Facebook study? What consent issues were present in this Facebook study? Could there have been any issues with regards to vulnerable populations in this study? How would you feel if you found out that you were unknowingly part of this Facebook study? Finally, considering the hypothesis of the study that more negative content would lead to more negative posts and vice versa, could Facebook have addressed this hypothesis without manipulating the news feed content of these 700,000 Facebook users?

Link: Everything You Need to Know About Facebook’s Controversial Emotion Experiment | WIRED

Looking for competent nursing writers for your nursing and medical related classes? Trust ONLY competent nursing writers to handle your writing tasks.
All tasks are done from scratch and we guarantee 100% confidentiality. Order now for15% discount on your first order with us

Use the following coupon
"SAVE15"

Order Now